Over the last decade, SCOTUS and in some ways Congress have expanded the notion of corporate personality well beyond that originally intended for the corporate form. This is reflected in cases like Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, No. , 558 U.S. (2010), McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, 572 U.S. ___ (2014) and Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, 573 U.S. ___ (2014). Many think this is an outright assault on the fundamental nature of democracy by allowing a legal fiction to have rights only previously recognized in natural persons. This distortion of the limited personality granted so corporations could own property, enter into contract and avail themselves of the courts has led to a situation where elections are seen as less of an exercise in democracy and more an exercise in plutocratic oligarchy where office is purchased for hand picked crony candidates by the highest bidder. No matter how one feels about the effects of this movement, the root cause is the expansion of corporate personality.
Search
-
- Follow Flowers For Socrates on WordPress.com
Authors
Recent Comments
Dr. Dean Albert Rams… on TCS: To Hear the Flute of Your… Dr. Dean Albert Rams… on Virginia Woolf: A Room of One… Dr. Dean Albert Rams… on TCS: “All That’s Best of Dark… Dr. Dean Albert Rams… on A Cinderella Story wordcloud9 on TCS: A New Year – Laughter tha… johncoyote on TCS: A New Year – Laughter tha… wordcloud9 on TCS: A New Year – Laughter tha… Evidence Mutumbu on TCS: A New Year – Laughter tha… wordcloud9 on A Poem for Old Rock Day Becky Ross Michael on A Poem for Old Rock Day wordcloud9 on A Cup of Kindness Yet rafflaw on A Cup of Kindness Yet wordcloud9 on Another Kind of Christmas Irene Fowler on Another Kind of Christmas wordcloud9 on A Holiday Greeting from I… -
Recent Posts
- TCS: To Hear the Flute of Your Whole Existence
- Trump and the cursed golden stool – A Folktale
- Virginia Woolf: A Room of One’s Own
- TCS: “All That’s Best of Dark and Bright”
- A Poem for Cheese Lover’s Day
- A Floral Universe Award
- TCS: What Do You Want to Remember?
- A Poem for International Kite Day
- A Cinderella Story
- TCS: A New Year – Laughter that Cold and Blizzards Could Not Kill
- A Poem for Old Rock Day
- Jack Smith and Jan 6
Archives
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- Follow Flowers For Socrates on WordPress.com
I’m for dismantling the legal fiction of corporate “personhood” — even before the expansion of corporate “rights” by the Right Wing of the Supreme Court, it was used far too often to shield corporate boards and executives from the dire consequences of their decisions, including the deliberate choice to not fix product problems that were lethal because it was more “cost effective” to deal with law suits.than to save lives.
I can’t vote for any of these options, and since it is not a political election, no need to vote for least worst. None of the options reflect my viewpoints. I believe corporations should have the same rights as an individual, but not superior rights, and must be limited to no more total contribution threshold than any individual…e.g., no pseudo-independent super-PAC’s and no outlandish financial influence. My reasoning is that many corporate stocks and investments are held in mutual funds and are not even necessarily known to the individuals who invest in mutual funds…who need at least minimal representation in the financial political process. Further I also believe no union should have total thresholds higher than an individual…e.g. no union quasi-super-PAC status either. These views might require the FCC to require “equal time” provisions apply to all candidates, and/or organizations acting as an individual, and I’d be fine with that. Voices would be heard equally if they took the effort. Plutocratic oligarchy bothers me and I’d like to see it reigned in financially. Mr Trump would certainly have less media coverage for “entertainment” or each candidate would have equal coverage.
WP ate my comment and at this point I’m not in the mood to explain it again. Suffice it to say none of the options above reflect my opinions.
Voted “no” – it is time to get rid of the corporate veil.
if it moves the personification to the elimination of religious tax-exemption then by Xenu and Kolob, it’s actually a good thing
Aridog,
Comment rescued. Spam filter seems to be set on “extra grumpy.”
The 14th Amendment has been interpreted by the courts exactly the way the railroad-owned Congressmen intended that it be interpreted when they made citizen to be person, hoping that it wouldn’t be noticed. Since there was no discussion at the time the amendment was being enacted, other Congressmen seemed to believe that it meant citizens, as in the first two sentences. But persons became all persons, real and artificial by other railroad advocates, through a footnote/sidenote, not a judge. The fundamental issue of whether or not the 14th amendment SHOULD apply equally to artificial persons has never had legislative discussion. It’s too bad we have a corporate-owned majority on the Supreme Court that followed previous judges that followed a non-judge’s pov that put railroad rights before those of the real, living, persons.
When this Frankenstein was created by the courts, they also gave it a psychotic brain. The prime directive of the corporation being to increase the profits of the shareholders. So these remorseless beings privatize profits and socialize costs and externalities. Handing over public services to corporations is like handing over mom to the care of Norman Bates.
The error in creating the corporation as a person is that it doesn’t limit their participation with mega-dollars via PAC’s…which I’d abolish, along with mega-dollar union PAC-like behavior. A “person” has a threshold for contributions, and the Corporations and Unions should have the identical threshold…but I’d consider raising it to $5000 for all, and no more. Equal time provisions for media would level that playing field as well…no more all Trump all the time. Smart advertisers would still sponsor the equal time presentations…win-win IMO. That or I’m just too optimistic 🙂
PS: Chuck Stanely … thank you for the “rescue”…I guess the filter is just as “grumpy” as me at times.
The Fairness Doctrine and Equal Time rules need to be revisited.
Mary Wehrheim said…
Handing over public services to corporations is like handing over mom to the care of Norman Bates.
I think you be surprised, shocked perhaps, to know just how much public service is already handed over …e.g., contracted out…to corporations today. The recent pollution of the Animus River in Colorado, now reaching Lake Powell, was by errors made by such a corporate contractor under the EPA’s (slight) oversight. The clean up, if even possible considering the heavy metals involved in sediments laid down, will be perhaps the largest ever attempted. Lake Michigan had high levels of Mercury in 1975…and still does…check the recommendations for salmon and trout consumption with fishing license info booklet.
That’s just one instance…I spent a long time in DOD and could cite a long list of such contracts of public services and military services…some of them on the military side making it impossible for the USA to move a Division or two quickly in to a emergency, for a couple weeks or more, without the contractors….who are always hesitant to enter combat zones. When they show up eventually, they prefer the enclave concept and are not very good at mobile actions. I used to joke that Grand Fenwick could take over Boston and we’d be unable to stop them until Kellog, Brown, & Root caught up.
Trouble is it is not a joke…very few of our emergency response military units are fully self sufficient…an exception might be the 173rd Airborne Brigade stationed in Italy and some USMC expeditionary units with Navy back up instead of KBR or the equivalent.