Depression-era policy to return for farmers screwed by Trump trade war.

 By ann summers

US President Donald Trump’s recently announced import tariffs on steel, aluminum, and $60 billion in other goods that the US imports from China each year are in keeping with his record of responding to nonexistent problems. Unfortunately, while Trump captures the world’s attention, serious real problems go unaddressed.…

Grand Kleptocrat Trump will crater the US economy because he thinks trade wars are simply about firms, industries, and markets, rather than people working and living in regions. It’s not as simple as the revanchist profit touted by Agent Orange.

A stinging editorial in the Quad City Times in Iowa declared that voters had been “conned” by Trump on trade. “Eight of the country’s top 10 soybean producers voted for Trump in 2016.”

In just one week, Trump has already flip-flopped from his irrational claim that “trade wars are good, and easy to win.”

What’s obvious is that Trump’s base is going to pay the biggest price for his reckless tariff rhetoric.

“Many of the farmers who helped propel Donald Trump to the presidency fear becoming pawns in his escalating trade war with China, which threatens markets for soybeans, corn and other lifeblood crops in the Upper Midwest,” the Washington Post reported on Monday.

Trump to farmers: My trade war has to hurt you ‘for the country’

“They want to hit the farmers because they think it hits me”

“These are great patriots. They understand that they’re doing this for the country.”

The Trump administration has moved aggressively to levy tariffs on China, including $50 billion in penalties proposed early last week. After China retaliated by proposing $50 billion in tariffs on U.S. goods, including soybeans, the White House late Thursday said Trump had ordered officials to look at another $100 billion in tariffs on China.

Many farmers have expressed fear that their livelihoods could be impacted in the escalating trade war, given that China is a major market for agricultural exports, particularly soybean and sorghum.…

Trump’s aides are looking at ways to use the Commodity Credit Corporation, a division of the Agriculture Department that was created in 1933 to offer a financial backstop for farmers.

But while the White House is considering the idea as a way to protect farmers if China slaps tariffs on U.S. agricultural products, some GOP lawmakers have told the administration that the approach will not work. The program, the lawmakers say, will not be able to provide the needed relief to farmers, and using it will further inflame trade tensions with China.

Economic warfare, while more profitable for the most avaricious capitalist, will also ratchet up conflicts in non-economic areas and ultimately create greater social division and  inequality.


There will be significant repercussions for the rest of the world if America moves to unravel today’s system of open, rules-based global trade – a system of which the US has been the chief architect. Only if other countries absorb the lessons of previous periods when revanchist trade techniques were used can they preemptively mitigate the effects of Trump’s measures.…

Key point: When the U.S. counters in a trade war, it’s hurting *Americans*.

(Tariffs help some American producers, but hurt American consumers even more.)

Here’s how a trade war works:
– The U.S. fires off a round of tariffs, which hurts both China and the U.S.
– China retaliates, which hurts both China and the U.S.
– This continues as each round hurts both China and the U.S.
– Somehow someone wins(???)

Awesome, huh?

The question is, which superpower can continue punching its own people in the face for the longest?

Overnight markets look pretty unhappy about the President repeatedly punching Americans in the face.

This article at is worth your time.

Over the course of a few games, players tended to become less cooperative (imposing more tariffs overall) and more retaliatory (introducing tariffs of their own in response their opponent’s tariffs). And they became slightly less likely to mimic the behavior of their trading partner. All of this was a recipe for trade wars.DaDMSeJX4AAmjpk[1]…


This entry was posted in Capitalism, China, Economic Policy, Foreign Policy, Government, Government Propaganda, History, Uncategorized and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Depression-era policy to return for farmers screwed by Trump trade war.

  1. Terry Welshans says:

    I am not in the least surprised that tRUmp is more than willing to feed the farmers into the meat grinder. I have relatives who farm in Iowa who are staunch tRUmp supporters who continue to support this guy who cares little for them. These folks do not see how they voted against their interests, which I find difficult to understand.

    To them, I offer my thoughts and prayers.

    I ask they recall one of my favorite biblical quotations,

    Galatians 6:7: Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. Whatever a man sows, he will reap in return.

    They are the ones who voted him in against their own interests. He said he would do it, and they said it was good.

    That causes me to also recall Luke 6:43-45: No good tree bears bad fruit, nor does a bad tree bear good fruit. (44) Each tree is recognized by its own fruit. People do not pick figs from thornbushes, or grapes from briers.

    I could go on, but it would be ‘preaching to the choir.’

  2. pete says:

    It’s not just a Chinese trade war that’s worrying midwest farmers right now, trump’s EPA has also been granting wavers to refineries on renewable fuels.

    • Terry Welshans says:

      I know a fellow who manages one of the ethanol plants in Illinois. He is very concerned about the corn supply that feeds his plant. On one hand, supply may be available at low cost if the corn production remains the same, but on the other hand, as we are now entering planting time, the farmers may plant less in anticipation of a weak market, raising the price when it is harvested. Farming is a relatively long-term plan, not a ‘spur-of-the-moment’ decision. You do not want to make plans that are going to drive you into bankruptcy on a moment-to-moment government whim. It is also unlikely the government will make the farmers or others who rely on them whole under this administration, as it can not be trusted, which seems to be its hallmark.

Comments are closed.