Rule #4 has been amended to clarify its relationship to Rules 2 and 3 as follows:
b) “Stalking” is “any person who intentionally and repeatedly follows or harasses another person and who makes a credible threat, either expressed or implied, with the intent to place that person in reasonable fear of death or serious bodily harm”. This standard may be used in conjunction with the standard of persistent disruptive behavior found in Rule #1 as a reason for banishment. Stalking behavior may also be used as a reason for banishment in conjunction with either Rule #2 and/or Rule #3.
Gene Howington, Editor-in-Chief
Ah man – can’t we all just get along – even if we don’t agree?
Sheeessshhh….
Gene,
OK, OK, I’ll stop stalking you!
Bob;
🙂
Gene – Shorter version:
“Those who stir the shitpot shall be made to lick the spoon.”
Ha ha, Otteray…you’re so cool..
Though (arguably) I’m the one who stewed it, by bringing it in to play (so to speak).
Like in court “He opened the door Your Honor”
Now That would be irony (as happened at DK with B). I get baited and banned; and the Troll task force jumps with glee!
I haven’t been on in awhile, why do I feel guilt and shame and that it’s directed to me.
Mens rea or perhaps you have a fondness for contaminated kitchenware?
Follow, is that stalking?
Lol
Hey AY, missed ya guy
Havent had any free time to stop by JT ( though I dont state short the Step father should get tried fir hus dumbnesz)
How have you been?
Where have ye been?
Cool…
Everyone (well almost) us being punny
Anyone who establishes a written presence on this blog has a fairly strong ego believing others will benefit from their thoughts. Blogs live in the Wild West that is the internet community. Gene, as proprietor of this small Wild West town, is simply establishing a bit of order so that said egos may flourish. Establishing that order is his responsibility for he built the damn place and his name is on it.
New people come from other towns where the rules may be different. Fine. If you want to live here you’re given time to learn and adjust. One warning should suffice but that’s up to the proprietor.
Don’t like the rules? Saddle up and move down the road apiece. There’s another town just around the bend. There’s also lots of open space to build your own.
Now this is an excellent rule! I wish all blogs would have one just like it and blog owners who have the decency to enforce it equally.
LDL,
I have been busy, busy, busy…. But good seeing you here too. I read Turley the other day and see that charlton is still a guest blogger, I suppose in name only.
Inga,
As you see Nick knows he’s not welcome here. He has run off anyone with a different view point. I see Mark is no longer a GB…. One of the last original commenters if the site, Turleys that is.
I’ve given some grief to the professor and he tolerates me, knowing the odds on Mitt running 2016
A number of original commenters have been banned. I just am waiting and watching for when Darren gets barred as well.
Darren is the favorite of the prof and nick and his gang. Why would he be barred?
AY
WOW!
Good point swm but as we see nick pulls the strings…. It will be a matter of time.
Ay & swarthmoremom,
I rarely visit RIL these days. I missed it at first…but not anymore. We have much better discussions here at FFS. In addition, we can post whenever we want.
Doubt it. Darren holds libertarian views and does not care much for the democrats. Nick, Squeeky et al approve. I have voluntarily stayed away from RIL for awhile. I don’t know, Elaine. Sean Hannity is creeping in over here too. lol
Elaine,
Gene has invoked an anti stalking addition to subsection (c) of part B (3) …
Might be right… I didn’t say I wasn’t posting.
RIL should go RIP
His agenda lean is beginning to make Bob look straightforward
swarthmoremom,
“Elaine. Sean Hannity is creeping in over here too. lol”
Tell me about it!