Putin place or Put in place. Trump’s interest conflicts because conflicts interest him.

By ann summers

DaUrrXAWAAA5QcH_1_[1]

Chinese wall is a business term describing an information barrier within an organization that was erected to prevent exchanges or communication that could lead to conflicts of interest. … Firms are generally required by law to safeguard insider information and ensure that improper trading does not occur. (wikipedia)

Trump tried to claim the government can’t walk and chew gum, but fails three days later at getting a Temporary Restraining Order in an attempt to isolate Cohen raid booty.

Darned irony for a guy who has emolument issues and has spent 100 million tax dollars on golf. T’aint nothing to a guy who doesn’t use prophylactics when he has flings at tournaments.

Darn that political economy of lawfare not quite working like Sun Tsu’s Art of War in the use of Chinese walls. Much unlike Trump’s Mexican Wall.

 

“U.S. District Court Judge Kimba Wood on Monday afternoon rejected a motion by the lawyer that attempted to block the FBI from reviewing the files they seized from Cohen last week.”

ripe for abuse

A taint team (what used to be referred to as a Chinese Wall, thanks to quaint Anglo-American legal tradition) is just to separate unrelated and client privileged information from legitimately seized items.

have-fun-storming-the-castle_new_1_.jpg

Trump “sued his business adversaries some 1,900 times in the past decades, which, according to the study, is far out of proportion from what similar businesses were doing,” said Arizona State University law professor Orde Kittrie, a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. “And if you look at quotes from Donald Trump, and you look at quotes from people associated with him, they see law as a weapon to be used to advance their business interests and crash their adversaries in business.”

Kittrie, author of the book Lawfare: Law as a Weapon of War, sees the concept as neutral “just like a rifle or a missile” that “can be used by the United States or by our enemies.” “when law cuts to our advantage, we should use it and we should approach it very systematically.”

Biglygate features some structural coordination of external and internal 2016 election mischief, both foreign and domestic.

That includes the data-mining and the stolen Facebook info, the hacking, the troll-bots, the stolen emails, all less related to the vaporware and behavioral influence/persuasion claims and more about affecting GOTV in swing states. Wisconsin’s vote suppression alone should have brought compensatory legal action.

The 2016 US election was a lawfare battle-space, where force symmetry was not a governing principle, and information asymmetry is at a premium.

There was collusion and criminal intent, but like neoliberal capitalism, there was no single agency / cause other than the creative destruction of US democracy. Many institutions and individuals wanted to maximize money and power. The GOP was sufficiently mercenary to seek and accept Russian assistance to achieve their goals.

The perfect storm emerged from having the optimal candidate with decades of kompromat sufficient to manipulate money and power, and to enlist Americans willing to expedite active measures.

As we saw with the perfect storm of the 2016 election, the margins decided things, regardless of Russians, but they were a contributing factor if only because finance capital has the means, motive and opportunity to corrupt democratic elections.

But it will still be all about the oligarchic money trail and the perfect storm of 2016 (совершенныйбрать штурмом) in which the Giant Orange кит swam.

 

NEW: President Trump has asked a federal court in New York to block federal agents from reviewing materials seized in a raid of his private lawyer, Michael Cohen.

 

The president’s other personal attorneys that they, acting on President Trump’s behalf, and Cohen should be the ones to determine which materials are privileged.

 

There’s an interesting dynamic here: The president, who supervises DOJ, is asking a federal court to rule that a fairly standard DOJ practice is unfair.

 

President Trump’s lawyers say the only person who can safely ensure that documents seized from Michael Cohen’s office do not contain privileged information is “the privilege-holder himself, the President.”

 

.@documentcloud uploads are going slowly tonight (@knowtheory?). But @MikeScarcellahas a link:

President Trump’s lawyers argue that DOJ must provide to him copies of any materials seized from Cohen “that relate to him in any way,” so that he can determine whether they are privileged and possibly block investigators from reviewing them.

 

President Trump’s lawyers say in a new court filing that the raid his Justice Department carried out against his personal attorney’s office and hotel room was “aggressive, intrusive and unorthodox.”

 

Our @big_cases bot (finally) has the filing:
View image on Twitter
View image on Twitter
View image on Twitter
View image on Twitter

 

Setting up a Chinese wall

The following measures can be used when it is necessary to put in place a Chinese wall to separate the affairs of two clients:
  • Compile a list of the individuals in the firm working for each client and ensure that no-one working for either client is in possession of confidential information relating to the other client.
  • Ensure that all members of the two advisory teams within the firm are aware of the rules concerning client confidentiality. Consider issuing written guidelines.
  • Place the two advisory teams in separate buildings or place one team in a part of a building with restricted access. Consider measures to log the movements of individuals, for example, by security passwords for entry into restricted access areas.
  • Store sensitive or confidential information in a physically separate location, for example, in a strong room fitted with combination locks.
  • Where information within the firm is placed on a central computer database to which all may have access, there may be confidentiality concerns. If so, use separate computer file servers to store information on one client separately from that of the other client. Also consider the ring-fencing of sensitive information by means of passwords and other IT security measures.The procedure for making back-up copies should also be considered, as security can sometimes break down when back-ups are being taken.If these solutions are used, it is, of course, vital to ensure that they are secure.

uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/…

President Donald Trump’s personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, will get to review the documents that the government seized from him before prosecutors do, a federal judge ruled Monday.

After the documents are provided to Cohen and his attorneys, the judge will decide whether a special government filter team or a so-called “special master” will get to further review the documents for those that might be covered by attorney-client privilege.

This entry was posted in 2016 Election, American History, Celebrity, Corruption, Countries, Courts, DOJ, Economics, Federal Courts, Government, History, Jurisprudence, Media, Political Science, Politics, Society, Uncategorized, United Kingdom, United States and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Putin place or Put in place. Trump’s interest conflicts because conflicts interest him.

  1. I have worked with the FBI and US Attorneys on both criminal and tort cases. You can bet that any firewall they set up is by the book, and effective. Those guys are pros, and would not risk losing a case because of some minor carelessness.

    This afternoon, I had an interesting conversation with a local police officer. He has a Bachelor’s Degree in criminal justice, with top grades. He hopes to eventually go to work for a Federal agency. He has been advised that the undergrad degree alone is no longer enough. He needs to either get a Master’s degree, or get a professional degree such as law or accounting. This is the current state of new hires in Federal law enforcement.

    Mr. Cohen graduated from the law school rated as “the worst law school in America.” Considering the competition for that spot, it is quite a statement to have that on his resume.

  2. ann summers says:

    I appreciate the problem of ABA and non-ABA accreditation, but like the MDs who graduate at the bottom of the class being still called “doctor”, if they pass the bar, they presumably still get to practice, although it always is interesting what ex-attorneys wind up doing.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s