By ann summers
The framing of that meme of “the worst act of mass shooting in US history” comes not only as an “act of terror and an act of hate” but also raises some other peripheral issues in the early hours of its occurrence. Profiling speech acts whether oral or textual focuses some of the terrorist’s message, even as the media message creates new elements that constitute the message.
The shooter made two sets of investigated inflammatory remarks to co-workers by the dead shooter related to terrorists in the past four years. These were inconclusive.
The specter of the shootings in San Bernadino also has the context of workplace issues of hate speech as well as the attempt to affiliate with international terror.
Complete 911 conversations between the shooter and authorities have yet to be released.
So pledges to Daesh like pledges to flags are more arbitrary than they are random. A reminder of course that they have intent, and opportunity whose causality is more than the sum of media effects.
The takeaway from this not unlike previous attacks is that a combination of factors, some rationalized to result in a psychotic action much like racism and homophobia are part of the ensemble, some mediated, some as reported by the shooter’s family, more unmediated, and not as some might want to claim, “stochastic”. They are institutionally aided in terms of gun access by a state-licensed, security officer as well as matters of collateral effect.
Access to weapons and other familial background relates also to very recent purchases by the shooter, but also open homophobic speech acts as well as domestic violence. A side note of course about FL gun laws is the George Zimmerman resale of the gun returned to him after killing Trayvon Martin.
A coincident incident in Santa Monica involved a threat to today’s Pride Parade in West Hollywood, CA, makes it clear that it is more than media effects in terms of finding causality in potential attacks on specific identity groups.









