By Elaine Magliaro
The New York Times has come under fire for an article that it published yesterday about the life of Michael Brown—the
unarmed teenager who was killed by a police officer in Ferguson, Missouri, recently. Jack Mirkinson (Huffington Post) said that Jon Eligon’s “lengthy profile of Brown” in the NYT touched on the “problems and promise” that Brown faced. He said, “Much of the piece could be seen as sympathetic towards him.”
Joanna Rothkopf (Salon) said that Eligon’s article “was a generally poignant piece about Michael Brown, the teenager who was gunned down by police officer Darren Wilson in Ferguson, Missouri.” She added that Eligon “wrote eloquently of Brown’s introspective final weeks struggling with religion and the meaning of life. However, the generally respectful article has unwittingly demonstrated the media’s unconscious bias.”
Rothkopf was referring to one paragraph in Eligon’s article that evidently “set people off”:
Michael Brown, 18, due to be buried on Monday, was no angel, with public records and interviews with friends and family revealing both problems and promise in his young life. Shortly before his encounter with Officer Wilson, the police say he was caught on a security camera stealing a box of cigars, pushing the clerk of a convenience store into a display case. He lived in a community that had rough patches, and he dabbled in drugs and alcohol. He had taken to rapping in recent months, producing lyrics that were by turns contemplative and vulgar. He got into at least one scuffle with a neighbor.








